Does automation reduce the need for skilled manual testers, or are they still essential?
Automation does not replace skilled manual testers. You start by exploring the app as a human to understand how it behaves, then automate those steps with low code, record and playback, code, or a mix. Automation brings speed while manual skill brings insight. Use both to form a complete testing strategy.
— Alex Martins, VP of Strategy at Katalon
Learn more
- How to decide what stays manual and what to automate
- 👉 https://katalon.com/resources-center/blog/manual-testing-vs-automation-testing
- How to turn manual steps into automation quickly
- 👉 https://katalon.com/resources-center/blog/from-manual-to-automation-testing
- Which test cases to automate first for impact
- 👉 https://katalon.com/resources-center/blog/how-to-select-regression-test-cases
- How to keep automated runs stable and low maintenance
- 👉 https://katalon.com/resources-center/blog/automated-regression-testing-best-practices
Follow Katalon for more insights in our #AutomationDecoded series!