Software Testing is primarily an information-gathering process that assists stakeholders in making informed decisions. However, it can be problematic to gather information if the testing process is constantly interrupted by diversions and interruptions. Software Testing tools and test automation scripts can lead to false positives if proper measures and considerations are not taken when setting up the testing and automation process.
The blog post’s title mentions two essential things working in today’s technological world – Javascript and Selenium Webdriver. As an engineer, it would probably be a rare instance if you have never encountered Javascript and Webdriver or heard their names. Currently, there are 1.17 billion websites on the internet today, and the popularity of Javascript is evident that 98% of all websites use Javascript today.
Automated user interface testing is an essential but frequently overlooked component of the software delivery cycle. Users access the software by interacting with the User Interface (UI) for the application’s basic functionalities, which makes the User Interface (UI) the most integral component of any web or mobile application, also known as the Graphical User Interface. GUI requires a mechanism to test the UI to maximize a smooth user experience continuously.
Postman is arguably a great collaboration platform for API management. Postman is an excellent tool for deconstructing RESTful APIs created by others or testing ones created by yourself. It provides a slick user interface for making HTML requests, eliminating the need to write a bunch of code to test an API’s functionality. Moreover, Postman is ideal for RESTful API tests. It is not a good design for SOAP APIs and other APIs.
Perfecto is indeed one of the best options for doing automated tests on mobile devices. However, if you’re looking for Perfecto Mobile alternatives, you’re in the right place. We made a list of mobile cloud providers that can do both manual and functional testing. Thankfully, we managed to find eight different mobile applications that can put up a good fight against the likes of Perfecto Mobile.
Software testing tools have become a necessity when it comes to scaling software delivery. qTest is the first option that comes to mind when you’re starting off. It’s an affordable and easy-to-use cloud-based automation solution. But what if it’s not the right fit for you? Not to worry – there are plenty of great options, each with unique strengths and weaknesses. Here we’ll look at some of the best qTest alternatives available today.
Testlio is an automated testing tool that allows users to get a hierarchical view of the testing workflow. It also lets the testers move and copy the test results and do parameterized testing. And the no-code approach of this testing platform makes things a breeze for customers. However, with a lack of flexibility on rollover hours, it just might not meet your testing requirements. Here are some Testlio alternatives that bridge the gap.
The iterative approach to software development emerged around the 1990s. What started as a small co-located, self-sustaining team approach was widely adopted by many development teams. The agile mindset paved way for multiple development frameworks, including the infamous “Scrum methodology”. With time, processes undergo metamorphoses, during which a few unpleasant practices sneak in causing distractions within the teams.
The platform for a centralized solution for all testing efforts, PractiTest, is well known amongst many agile teams. Although nowadays, several features within this tool, which was once well reputed for testing effectively, have been claimed to be absent or contain various issues. For such reasons, QA engineers are looking ceaseless for the top PractiTest alternatives, and this article will mention some of the best ones! Table Of Contents.
An integral part of a web designer, a web developer, and a web tester’s work revolves around testing elements on the web application. For someone unaware of the inspector’s strengths, the first thing that would come to your mind to initiate testing is sharing the code. But the next thing you know, you are restricted from doing such a task as the source is confidential and should not be shared with people other than those related to the development team of the same project.
An automated testing tool is a must-have tool for every developer. Without making the web and mobile apps go through automated tests, you can never be sure how optimized they actually are. Now, for checking the web and mobile applications on different real mobile devices and multiple browsers, Headspin is a typical pick for many. But what if we told you that you have nothing to worry about if you do not have access to Headspin?
Playwright is a software testing platform designed to permit reliable and quick cross-browser web automation. This ever-green automation software has been winning the hearts of developers for its competence in automated testing and execution of parallel testing. However, this test automation software comes with a lot of disadvantages that can turn out to be major disappointments for software testers.
People often use the terms – code coverage and test coverage interchangeably, which is wrong because they are two different things. As both of them are used to measure the efficacy of code, the terminologies get tricky at times for the development and testing teams. So if you are wondering how – code coverage is the evaluation of the code that is executed, and test coverage is a measure of the features being tested that are covered by the test.
