Systems | Development | Analytics | API | Testing

The ability to push an update directly to your users’ devices without App Store review, without delay, without any action required from the user, is one of the most powerful capabilities available to a React Native team. Over-the-air (OTA) updates change how fast you can respond to bugs, iterate on features, and ship improvements. But that power cuts both ways. A bad OTA update reaching 100% of your users at once is considerably worse than a bad store release.

Data issues in real estate platforms rarely show up as a single failure — they surface as mismatched listings, inconsistent ownership records, and unreliable valuation inputs across systems. What’s often harder is translating those challahges into something measurable and tied to business impact. This guide focuses on that gap — how to quantify data quality issues, connect them to revenue and churn, and build a BI layer that makes data debt visible in product and engineering decisions.

UAT, or user acceptance testing, is the final phase of software testing where real users or business stakeholders verify that a product meets business requirements and works as expected before release. For example, imagine you’re testing a user registration page on a website to make sure new users can set up their account easily. A UAT scenario might confirm that users can: That’s user acceptance testing in action: validating that a real user can complete an important workflow successfully.

The rise of AI-assisted coding has transformed how software is built. With tools generating entire features in seconds, the bottleneck is no longer writing code—it’s verifying it. Because AI can generate boilerplate and handle API integrations instantly, more service changes are being pushed into authentication logic, API calls, and configurations. Teams desperately need a way to verify these changes before merging, especially when the code touches external dependencies.

Perforce Delphix vs. K2View — which one is better for your data management and compliance needs? Each provider has strengths and weaknesses, so it’s important that you find the right one that checks your boxes, prioritizes your top needs, and fits your use cases. In this blog, we’ll detail compare Delphix vs. K2view, including their key differences, use cases, integrations, and Delphix customer testimonies.

Agentic Testing and QA is a practice in which AI agents operate directly on a project — reading files, planning tasks, generating framework code, and interacting with a browser — rather than simply answering prompts inside a chat window. Tools like Claude Code bring this capability to the terminal, giving QA teams a command-line assistant that understands repository context, proposes changes before applying them, and generates test assets across Playwright, Selenium, and API testing workflows.

AI agents do not just respond. They interpret goals, use tools, follow workflows, apply context, and sometimes change real systems. That means they need a different kind of testing.

Security vulnerabilities in production environments rarely arrive one at a time. Recently, one of our enterprise Node.js support customers identified a collection of security advisories affecting their Node.js infrastructure. The affected environments were running Node.js v20 and v22 and included vulnerabilities not only within runtime-adjacent tooling but also in components distributed alongside Node.js deployments.

Enterprises are buying AI infrastructure faster than their platform teams can operationalize it. Dell and ClearML are working together to close that gap, giving enterprises a faster, simpler path from Dell AI Factory hardware to a production-grade AI platform. Dell carries the hardware. ClearML provides the AI infrastructure layer on top. Together, the two give platform teams a way to deliver AI as a service to their organization without a multi-year integration project.