Company drives effort to reduce $1.1 trillion in failed digital payments. Austin, TX, July 9, 2024 – Testlio, a leading quality management company, today announced that its clients achieve an estimated 5x return on investment (ROI) through its payments testing services. This milestone underscores Testlio’s pivotal role in mitigating the critical issue of failed digital payments, which cost businesses an estimated $1.1 trillion annually.

Quality assurance (QA) activities are often seen as a necessary yet time-consuming and expensive process. This outlook can often limit the potential and impact of good QA. In reality, QA is not just about finding and fixing bugs; it’s a strategic value-add that can drive innovation, improve product stickiness, accelerate time-to-market, and enhance overall product quality. Yet, finding the balance between a necessary task and strategic impact can be challenging for many organizations.

Quality and functionality are critical factors in software development. This is where testing methodologies like smoke testing and functional testing come into play. Smoke testing is a high-level, preliminary testing process to ensure that a software program’s most critical functions are working correctly. In contrast, functional testing is a more detailed and thorough testing process.

The modern-day SDLC methodologies such as agile, CI/CD, and DevOps are flexible enough to incorporate change requests in each sprint, which increases the probability of introducing errors in existing functionality. This makes validating existing functionality, detecting newly introduced bugs, and resolving them mandatory in each build release. Whether manual or automated, such software testing is widespread and referred to as regression testing.

New apps and products enter the market daily, each undergoing rigorous testing before release. As automated processes advance across various industries, software development is no exception. Many quality assurance (QA) teams heavily invest in automation to handle most of their tests. This ensures repeatable tests are efficiently executed while quality assurance professionals focus on other tasks. With all these advancements, one might wonder: Is manual testing still important? The answer is yes!

Is there a formula or approach to estimate how much you should spend on your quality engineering (QE) efforts? Our CEO, Steve Semelsberger, is frequently asked that question in discussions with other leaders. In part II of his quality engineering for CEOs series, Steve guides us through various scenarios and offers a unique approach to calculating your QE spend based on your specific business needs. Read the article now! If you missed part I, you can catch up on it here.

Regression defects are unexpected errors that arise in previously functional software following updates or modifications to the codebase. A significant 85% of development managers agree that reducing technical debt, including regression defects, without compromising innovation has become increasingly difficult. If you’re like most software developers or testers, you’re always looking to improve the quality of your code. One way to do this is by understanding and preventing regression defects.

In software development, manual testing is key to ensuring quality and user satisfaction. This guide covers the basics of manual testing, its types, and how to perform it effectively. Studies show that 41% of software bugs are found through manual testing. In this article, we’ll explore different types of manual testing, such as exploratory, usability, and regression testing. We’ll also compare manual testing with automated testing.

Have you ever considered the importance of test automation services in software development? There is growing user demand for advanced features and faster releases, Moreover, development teams are constantly pressured to deliver high-quality applications quickly. Test automation transforms the industry by enabling faster, more efficient, and reliable testing processes. Automation testing offers numerous benefits: It’s faster, more efficient, and cost-effective than manual testing.

According to Gartner’s 2023 report, 60% of the organizations surveyed automate their software testing to boost product quality, 41% reported using it to speed up deployment, and 29% say it helps alleviate their QA teams’ workload. Also, 43% of these organizations claimed that test automation results in higher test accuracy. Despite automation’s large-scale adoption and various benefits, many QA leaders and test engineers find its implementation challenging.