Systems | Development | Analytics | API | Testing

AI adoption programs tend to end in the same place. Tools are accessible, usage is up, and there's a dedicated Slack channel for wins. Six months later, nothing about how the team works has fundamentally changed. People are doing the same things – just slightly faster. And it’s easy for programs to stall when you’re measuring the wrong thing. Adoption (whether people have access and whether they're using the tools) is visible and easy to report.

Live polls are a staple of conferences, streams, and all-hands: a question goes up on the big screen, everyone votes from their phone, and the bars race each other in realtime. There's a lot of different ways you could implement this.

GitHub Copilot, Claude, and Cursor have become genuine superpowers for API development. They draft OpenAPI definitions, generate endpoints, propose schema changes, and write test cases — all from inside the IDE, in real time. Teams using these tools are generating API definitions faster than most thought possible even a few years ago. That velocity is real, and it’s reshaping how engineering teams think about their toolchain.

When automated test script generation consumes a significant chunk of engineering capacity, your roadmap was already behind the eight ball before the sprint even began.

Rubber duck debugging allows us to discover our own coding errors by retracing our steps. Instead of relying on complex black-box tools, we simply explain our own logic until the problem reveals itself. This is one of the most straightforward debugging techniques around, and it can be easily enhanced by AI tools.

Despite years of progress in cloud testing platforms, network latency remains the most stubborn – and often ignored – variable in load testing reliability. A recent study highlights that network latency can skew load test results by as much as 30%. That’s not a rounding error; it’s the difference between a site that passes in the lab and one that buckles under real-world traffic.

Token optimization is the new tokenmaxxing. Here's why burning fewer tokens produces better software and why the economics of AI make this shift inevitable.

Understanding the health of a Test Plan isn't always as straightforward as it sounds. A Test Plan may contain hundreds of Tests, multiple Test Executions, linked requirements, and defects spread across different areas of a project. The information teams need is usually there, but finding answers often means navigating through several screens, reviewing reports, and manually connecting the dots. Questions such as How much testing has been completed?, Are there any coverage gaps?

If you have built an AI chat feature with the Vercel AI SDK, you have used its useChat hook. You give it your messages, and it streams the reply into your UI. You may have seen our post on the custom transport we built for the Vercel AI SDK. It swaps useChat's default transport for Ably AI Transport, adding resumable streams, cross-device and multi-user sync, conversation branching, history compaction, and stop-and-approve controls.

You add a stop button to your AI chat app: a customer support agent, a coding assistant, a research tool the user can steer mid-task. A user clicks it mid-response. The frontend stops rendering. Then you check your backend logs and realize the underlying generation is still running, and you’re still paying for every token. This is not a bug.