Systems | Development | Analytics | API | Testing

Choosing the right AI test case builder requires evaluating integration depth, not just feature lists. Evaluate AI test case builders based on how they enhance your current workflow rather than how many features they advertise. Your QA team is drowning in test cases. Requirements change daily, releases accelerate weekly, and manual test creation has become the bottleneck everyone acknowledges but nobody has time to fix. An AI test case builder seems like the obvious solution.

While every organization races to deploy AI agents faster, finance departments are watching something alarming unfold—and it will play a large part in determining who survives the agentic era. The numbers are stark: 84% of companies report more than 6% gross margin erosion from AI costs. Within that, 26% report erosion of 16% or more. And only 15% of companies can forecast AI costs within ±10% accuracy—the majority miss by 11-25%, and nearly one in four miss by more than 50%.

While every organization races to deploy AI agents faster, a quieter crisis is compounding in the background, and it will play a large part in determining who survives the agentic era. The numbers are stark. Too many executives see AI governance as a brake on innovation or something to figure out later, after the speed problem is solved. With agentic AI, that's backwards.

Scaling test automation from hundreds to thousands of tests introduces challenges underestimate. Maintenance overhead compounds as UI changes ripple through test suites. Parallel execution becomes essential but complex to orchestrate. Enterprise applications like SAP, Salesforce, and Oracle demand specialized testing approaches.

AI is reshaping test automation fundamentals. Features that once required hours of manual scripting can now adapt automatically to UI changes, generate realistic test data on demand, and help teams predict which tests matter most. For QA engineers evaluating automation platforms, understanding how AI capabilities differ has become essential. This comparison examines SmartBear TestComplete, Tricentis Tosca, and Ranorex through their AI-powered features.

In November 2023, I flew to Germany to speak at Agile Testing Days, one of the leading software testing conferences. My keynote was called “10x Software Testing.” I knew there would be skepticism in the room.

Microsoft officially retired the built-in Salesforce ODBC connector in Access on October 28, 2025 for Microsoft 365 monthly versions and November 11 for semi-annual and perpetual licenses. Teams that relied on Access for quick Salesforce data pulls, lightweight reports, and dashboard connections suddenly found their Microsoft Access Salesforce connection not working. Here, we discuss what happened, who’s affected, and how to get your data flowing again with minimal disruption.

And instead of getting a generic answer or being told to check your dashboard, the AI pulls the exact numbers from your company’s data and gives you a real answer in seconds. This is no longer science fiction. A new technology called MCP (Model Context Protocol) makes this possible. It’s a standardized way for AI tools to securely connect to your business intelligence and analytics platforms and actually work with your real data.

Conversational Analytics in BigQuery in preview brings a sophisticated AI-powered reasoning engine directly into BigQuery Studio.

In the semiconductor world, “software" is more than just application code. It is a complex stack of firmware, bootloaders, microcode, drivers, and Board Support Packages (BSPs) that are intricately linked to the hardware being designed. To secure the supply chain, meet customer expectations, and maintain market access, semiconductor leaders need a dynamic, "living" SBOM strategy that assesses risk in real-time and provides a single source of truth for all teams to work from.