Systems | Development | Analytics | API | Testing

According to SmartBear’s Closing the AI Software Quality Gap study, 93% of teams are already using AI to generate code. The same study found that 60% expect AI to produce nearly half of all code within the next year. This shift in development velocity is already impacting software testing and quality. Most teams say application quality is suffering, and 60% have experienced quality issues in the past year because development is moving faster than testing can keep up.

Retail banking is quietly undergoing one of its biggest shifts in decades. Customers no longer compare banks to other banks. They compare them to Netflix, Amazon, and every digital experience that already gets them. That expectation has changed the game. This is where AI-powered personalization in retail banking comes in. Instead of offering generic products to broad customer segments, banks can now deliver hyper-relevant experiences in real time.

If your team uses Playwright to write tests and Katalon to manage them, you've likely felt the gap. Results sitting in local HTML files. No way to compare Playwright runs against your Selenium or Appium suites. Managers asking for a unified report, and you scrambling to stitch things together manually. That gap is now closed. The Katalon True Platform integration with Playwright is now officially here, and it changes how teams with mixed automation stacks approach Playwright test management at scale.

We are launching with this post a new series of blog articles and LinkedIn posts titled "Features Sitting Idle". In this series, we explore key features of OctoPerf that are either misused, misunderstood, or simply unknown to our users. It's time to shine a light on these hidden gems, features that are already there, ready to become a central part of how you test. This is probably the most common situation after a load test.

Lending has always been at the heart of banking. But the way loans originated is going through a quiet but powerful shift. Customers today expect instant decisions. Not in days. Not even in hours. They expect approvals in minutes, sometimes seconds. And they expect this experience to be smooth across mobile apps, web platforms, and embedded finance ecosystems. This is where the cracks in traditional systems start to show. Legacy platforms were never designed for this kind of speed or scale.

AI accelerated software creation. It did not accelerate software trust. QA fragmentation shows up as delayed releases, engineers doing reconciliation work, and a release-readiness signal nobody fully trusts at the moment it matters most.

Not long ago, the answer to who writes tests was simple: the quality assurance (QA) engineer does. They sat downstream of development, received a build, and translated requirements into scripts. It was a defined role with a defined output. That clarity is gone. In 2026, the person or system responsible for test creation might be a business analyst (BA) mapping out a customer journey, an AI agent expanding test coverage overnight, or a QA engineer who hasn’t written a traditional script in months.