Systems | Development | Analytics | API | Testing

Insurance companies face unique challenges in delivering reliable software quickly. Policy updates, claims processing, and regulatory compliance all demand precision and speed. Manual testing alone can create delays, introduce errors, and increase operational risk. That's where test automation for insurance industry comes in. Repetitive regression tests that previously take up so much time can easily be automated.

In today's digital-first world, we face a profound paradox. The technology that connects us, powers our businesses, and fuels innovation is also leaving a significant and growing impact on the environment. Data centres use more energy than certain nations, harmful code wastes gigawatts of electricity, and the ongoing need for more powerful gear means that creation and disposal never stop.

Load testing, performance testing and stress testing are often mixed up, but in today’s CI/CD pipelines and production-grade engineering, they are solving completely different purposed. If you want to: Automate testing within CI/CD pipelines, such as with Keploy, JMeter, Locust, or k6 This guide discusses the difference like Performance testing, Load testing and Stress testing.

We’ll always remember 2025 as the year AI code assistants went big. Copilot, Cursor, Claude, Windsurf, whatever. Developers went from mistrusting these tools, to being expected to turn over much of their coding labor to them. Even if, according to an extensive Stack Overflow survey, only 3 percent of professional developers say they ‘highly trust’ AI coding tools.

After some testing and bug fixes, one common question always remains: how do teams make sure that those defects are truly resolved, and no new regressions creep in? That’s where retesting testing becomes vital. Retest testing forms a very important aspect of any QA cycle, ensuring that the reported defects are fixed and working correctly before the software moves to production. Without it, even simple patches can introduce silent issues into live environments.

For years, APIs have been designed with one primary audience in mind: developers. The focus has been on making APIs discoverable, consistent, and easy for humans to consume. But in the AI era, a new audience has arrived: AI agents. As detailed in SmartBear’s newly published AI-Enabled API Lifecycle Report, this shift demands that organizations rethink how APIs are designed, tested, and managed to serve both human developers and intelligent systems effectively.

As coding has become more autonomous, so has code-based testing. AI agents can now write functions, generate code-based tests, and validate logic in the same workflow. But the other half of the testing equation, the system-level validation of non-code-based testing, hasn’t kept up. That disconnect is becoming one of the most critical constraints in modern software delivery.

The updates we make to Perforce ALM are deeply influenced by the real-world challenges our users face. We understand that those who work in highly regulated industries need trustworthy tools that deliver precision, traceability, and efficiency. That’s why we plan each round of ALM enhancements based directly on user comments and suggestions. This quick guide will look at recent updates around tagging and filtering and how to leverage these features for a more intuitive and efficient user experience.