Systems | Development | Analytics | API | Testing

It happens to all of us. As software projects grow, parts of the production code we ship end up without a comprehensive test suite. When you take another look at the same area of code after a few months, it may be difficult to understand; even worse, there might be a bug, and we don't know where to begin fixing it. Modifying production code without tests is a major challenge.

CodePush is a great way to ship over-the-air (OTA) updates, avoid app store approval delays, and roll out changes cautiously. Even though App Center has closed down, there are many options available to get started with CodePush. But some of the default settings can create undesirable behaviors, leaving teams wrongly thinking CodePush causes a bad user experience.

Organizations are under pressure to feed data lakes and lakehouses with fresher data while keeping a tight lid on cloud spend. The problem is that most ingestion stacks weren’t designed for the real-time, high-volume workloads that power modern analytics and artificial intelligence (AI). They rely on layers of connectors, ETL jobs, and maintenance processes that quietly inflate both infrastructure and operational costs. Confluent’s Tableflow was built to change that equation.

We’re introducing enhanced visibility for streaming workload performance on Confluent Cloud, making it easier for developers and operators to understand, troubleshoot, and optimize real-time applications. As Apache Kafka has become the backbone of data streaming, many teams rely on Confluent Cloud for its scale, elasticity, and reduced operational burden.

Ably is a realtime messaging platform, it's a pub/sub product where you can publish messages to channels and clients subscribed to those channels will receive those messages in realtime. It turns out that the Ably realtime platform is really well suited to being the transport that sits between your AI models and the clients receiving the generated responses.

You push a commit. The pipeline goes red. You run it again and get green. No code changed. Nothing in the environment changed. And yet, the result is different. If that sounds familiar, you're not alone. Flaky tests in test automation are one of the biggest hidden productivity drains in modern software delivery, and most teams are still treating them as a minor annoyance rather than a systemic problem. Spoiler: they're not minor. And the way teams traditionally try to fix flaky tests? It mostly backfires.

For years, credit underwriting was pretty straightforward. Lenders looked at a few fixed factors like credit scores and income, to decide who was worthy of a loan. If you didn’t fit the criteria, you were simply rejected. It worked, but only to a point. This approach left out many people who were actually creditworthy and often missed subtle shifts in market stability.

Most AI analytics tools added a chatbot to a dashboard and called it intelligence. These eight actually change how fast your team goes from question to decision.

A VP of Marketing presents an AI-generated performance review on a Monday morning. The CAC numbers are clean. The trend lines are directional. The exec summary recommends a $200K budget reallocation from paid search to organic content. The CFO nods. The budget shift is approved before lunch. Two weeks later, an analyst spot-checks one figure against the source system. The number doesn’t exist anywhere in the connected data.